↓ Skip to main content

The Pivotal Role of Adolescent Autonomy in Secondary School Classrooms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
The Pivotal Role of Adolescent Autonomy in Secondary School Classrooms
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10964-011-9739-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A. Hafen, Joseph P. Allen, Amori Yee Mikami, Anne Gregory, Bridget Hamre, Robert C. Pianta

Abstract

Student engagement is an important contributor to school success, yet high school students routinely describe themselves as disengaged. Identifying factors that alter (increase) engagement is a key aspect of improving support for student achievement. This study investigated students' perceptions of autonomy, teacher connection, and academic competence as predictors of changes in student engagement within the classroom from the start to the end of a course. Participants were 578 (58% female) diverse (67.8% White, 25.2% African American, 5.1% Hispanic, 1.2% Asian American) high school students from 34 classrooms who provided questionnaire data both at the start and the end of a single course. Novel results from a cross-lagged model demonstrated that students who perceived their classrooms as allowing and encouraging their own autonomy in the first few weeks increased their engagement throughout the course, rather than the typical decline in engagement that was demonstrated by students in other classrooms. This finding is unique in that it extended to both students' perceptions of engagement and observations of student engagement, suggesting a fairly robust pattern. The pertinence of this finding to adolescent developmental needs and its relationship to educational practice is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Lecturer 12 6%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 63 31%
Psychology 46 23%
Arts and Humanities 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 47 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,123,410
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#815
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,302
of 255,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.