You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducing injustice: Why recognition matters in conservation project evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102181 |
| Authors |
Kate Massarella, Susannah M. Sallu, Jonathan E. Ensor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Norway | 2 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#662,118
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#247
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,228
of 443,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.