↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a multi-herb supplement for erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a multi-herb supplement for erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaurang R Shah, Manojkumar V Chaudhari, Suresh B Patankar, Shrikant V Pensalwar, Vilas P Sabale, Navneet A Sonawane

Abstract

Evidence is lacking for multi-ingredient herbal supplements claiming therapeutic effect in sexual dysfunction in men. We examined the safety and efficacy of VigRX Plus (VXP) - a proprietary polyherbal preparation for improving male sexual function, in a double blind, randomized placebo-controlled, parallel groups, multi-centre study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Chemistry 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,725,129
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#284
of 3,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,769
of 187,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#8
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.