↓ Skip to main content

Influence of background noise on the performance in the odor sensitivity task: effects of noise type and extraversion

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Influence of background noise on the performance in the odor sensitivity task: effects of noise type and extraversion
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3222-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han-Seok Seo, Antje Hähner, Volker Gudziol, Mandy Scheibe, Thomas Hummel

Abstract

Recent research demonstrated that background noise relative to silence impaired subjects' performance in a cognitively driven odor discrimination test. The current study aimed to investigate whether the background noise can also modulate performance in an odor sensitivity task that is less cognitively loaded. Previous studies have shown that the effect of background noise on task performance can be different in relation to degree of extraversion and/or type of noise. Accordingly, we wanted to examine whether the influence of background noise on the odor sensitivity task can be altered as a function of the type of background noise (i.e., nonverbal vs. verbal noise) and the degree of extraversion (i.e., introvert vs. extrovert group). Subjects were asked to conduct an odor sensitivity task in the presence of either nonverbal noise (e.g., party sound) or verbal noise (e.g., audio book), or silence. Overall, the subjects' mean performance in the odor sensitivity task was not significantly different across three auditory conditions. However, with regard to the odor sensitivity task, a significant interaction emerged between the type of background noise and the degree of extraversion. Specifically, verbal noise relative to silence significantly impaired or improved the performance of the odor sensitivity task in the introvert or extrovert group, respectively; the differential effect of introversion/extraversion was not observed in the nonverbal noise-induced task performance. In conclusion, our findings provide new empirical evidence that type of background noise and degree of extraversion play an important role in modulating the effect of background noise on subjects' performance in an odor sensitivity task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,472
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,481
of 170,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.