| Title |
Management of non-urgent paediatric emergency department attendances; a retrospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x713885 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Leigh, Bimal Mehta, Lillian Dummer, Harriet Aird, Sinead McSorley, Venessa Oseyenum, Anna Cumbers, Mary Ryan, Karl Edwardson, Phil Johnston, Jude Robinson, Frans Coenen, David Taylor-Robinson, Louis W Niessen, Enitan D Carrol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 50% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,066,578
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,005
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,128
of 526,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#37
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.