↓ Skip to main content

Fitting In: Segregation, Social Class, and the Experiences of Black Students at Selective Colleges and Universities

Overview of attention for article published in Race and Social Problems, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 251)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Fitting In: Segregation, Social Class, and the Experiences of Black Students at Selective Colleges and Universities
Published in
Race and Social Problems, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12552-012-9077-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Torres, Douglas S. Massey

Abstract

We analyzed qualitative data gathered at a selective urban university with a large black student body. We found that black students from integrated backgrounds welcomed the chance to establish friendships with same-race peers even though they were at ease in white settings, whereas students from segregated backgrounds saw same-race peers as a source of comfort and refuge from a white world often perceived as hostile. These contrasting perceptions set up both groups for shock upon matriculation. Students from an integrated background were better prepared academically and socially, but were unfamiliar with urban black culture and uncomfortable interacting with students of lower class standing. Students from a segregated background were surprised to find they had little in common with more affluent students from integrated backgrounds. Although both groups were attracted to campus for the same reason-to interact with a critical mass of same-race peers-their contrasting expectations produced a letdown as the realities of intraracial diversity set in.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 24%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 47%
Psychology 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,556,234
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Race and Social Problems
#44
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,767
of 169,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Race and Social Problems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them