| Title |
A higgs-like dilaton
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal C, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2333-x |
| Authors |
Brando Bellazzini, Csaba Csáki, Jay Hubisz, Javi Serra, John Terning |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 64% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 79% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#1,454
of 9,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,445
of 205,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,068 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.