You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tourniquet use in total knee replacement does not improve fixation, but appears to reduce final range of motion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Orthopaedica, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3109/17453674.2012.727078 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Håkan Ledin, Per Aspenberg, Lars Good |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 50 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Orthopaedica
#1,251
of 1,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,049
of 191,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Orthopaedica
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.