↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the Assessment of Risk for Institutional Violence: A Cautionary Note on DeMatteo et al. (2020)

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Public Policy and Law, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in the Assessment of Risk for Institutional Violence: A Cautionary Note on DeMatteo et al. (2020)
Published in
Psychology, Public Policy and Law, November 2020
DOI 10.1037/law0000256
Authors

Mark E. Olver, Keira C. Stockdale, Craig S. Neumann, Robert D. Hare, Andreas Mokros, Arielle Baskin-Sommers, Eddy Brand, Jorge Folino, Carl Gacono, Nicola S. Gray, Kent Kiehl, Raymond Knight, Elizabeth Leon-Mayer, Matt Logan, J. Reid Meloy, Sandeep Roy, Randall T. Salekin, Robert Snowden, Nicholas Thomson, Scott Tillem, Michael Vitacco, Dahlnym Yoon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 3 6%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#360
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,113
of 440,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Public Policy and Law
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.