↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a roughness length parametrization accounting for wind–wave alignment in a coupled atmosphere–wave model

Overview of attention for article published in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of a roughness length parametrization accounting for wind–wave alignment in a coupled atmosphere–wave model
Published in
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/qj.3948
Authors

S. Porchetta, O. Temel, J.C. Warner, D. Muñoz‐Esparza, J. Monbaliu, J. van Beeck, N. van Lipzig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 17%
Engineering 3 13%
Energy 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,123,930
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
#1,989
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,156
of 506,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.