↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal cohort study of the impact of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults on quality of life: outcomes from the BRIGHTLIGHT study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal cohort study of the impact of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults on quality of life: outcomes from the BRIGHTLIGHT study
Published in
BMJ Open, November 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038471
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel M Taylor, Lorna A Fern, Julie Barber, Javier Alvarez-Galvez, Richard Feltbower, Sarah Lea, Ana Martins, Stephen Morris, Louise Hooker, Faith Gibson, Rosalind Raine, Dan P Stark, Jeremy Whelan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 19 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,722,245
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#5,316
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,942
of 518,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#154
of 813 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 813 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.