| Title |
Why are Asian countries outperforming the Western world in controlling COVID-19 pandemic?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pathogens and Global Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/20477724.2020.1850982 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Landoni, Nicolò Maimeri, Monica Fedrizzi, Stefano Fresilli, Artem Kuzovlev, Valery Likhvantsev, Pasquale Nardelli, Alberto Zangrillo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 33 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 89% |
| Scientists | 7 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#403,438
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Pathogens and Global Health
#13
of 1,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,246
of 529,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathogens and Global Health
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.