↓ Skip to main content

Two-stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With a High Rate of Infection Control but High Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Two-stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With a High Rate of Infection Control but High Mortality
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2595-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith R. Berend, Adolph V. Lombardi, Michael J. Morris, Adam G. Bergeson, Joanne B. Adams, Michael A. Sneller

Abstract

Periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a devastating complication. Reported rates of infection control range from 80% to 95% but mortality rates associated with treatment of infected THA are also substantial and we suspect underreported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Andorra 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 201 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 24 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 47 23%
Unknown 55 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 54%
Engineering 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 <1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 67 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,186,312
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,302
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,165
of 187,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#31
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.