↓ Skip to main content

When the Ink Runs Dry: Implications for Theory and Practice When Educators Stop Keeping Reflective Journals

Overview of attention for article published in Innovative Higher Education, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
When the Ink Runs Dry: Implications for Theory and Practice When Educators Stop Keeping Reflective Journals
Published in
Innovative Higher Education, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10755-014-9291-6
Authors

Janet E. Dyment, Timothy S. O’Connell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 31%
Arts and Humanities 8 16%
Linguistics 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Innovative Higher Education
#188
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,561
of 221,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Innovative Higher Education
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.