↓ Skip to main content

Fruitflow®: the first European Food Safety Authority-approved natural cardio-protective functional ingredient

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Fruitflow®: the first European Food Safety Authority-approved natural cardio-protective functional ingredient
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00394-016-1265-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niamh O’Kennedy, Daniel Raederstorff, Asim K. Duttaroy

Abstract

Hyperactive platelets, in addition to their roles in thrombosis, are also important mediators of atherogenesis. Antiplatelet drugs are not suitable for use where risk of a cardiovascular event is relatively low. It is therefore important to find alternative safe antiplatelet inhibitors for the vulnerable population who has hyperactive platelets in order to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Potent antiplatelet factors were identified in water-soluble tomato extract (Fruitflow(®)), which significantly inhibited platelet aggregation. Human volunteer studies demonstrated the potency and bioavailability of active compounds in Fruitflow(®). Fruitflow(®) became the first product in Europe to obtain an approved, proprietary health claim under Article 13(5) of the European Health Claims Regulation 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods. Fruitflow(®) is now commercially available in different countries worldwide. In addition to its reduction in platelet reactivity, Fruitflow(®) contains anti-angiotensin-converting enzyme and anti-inflammatory factors, making it an effective and natural cardio-protective functional food.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Chemistry 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,988,518
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#520
of 2,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,391
of 371,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.