You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving patient handovers from hospital to primary care: a systematic review.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACP Journal Club, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gijs Hesselink, Lisette Schoonhoven, Paul Barach, Anouk Spijker, Petra Gademan, Cor Kalkman, Janine Liefers, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, Hub Wollersheim |
| Abstract |
Evidence shows that suboptimum handovers at hospital discharge lead to increased rehospitalizations and decreased quality of health care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Spain | 4 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Iraq | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 32% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 292 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 18% |
| Researcher | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 12% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 75 | 25% |
| Unknown | 49 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 6% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#984,912
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from ACP Journal Club
#2,751
of 13,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,426
of 189,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACP Journal Club
#12
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.