↓ Skip to main content

Physiological Response to Water Immersion

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
320 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
586 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Physiological Response to Water Immersion
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200636090-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian M. Wilcock, John B. Cronin, Wayne A. Hing

Abstract

Recovery from exercise can be an important factor in performance during repeated bouts of exercise. In a tournament situation, where athletes may compete numerous times over a few days, enhancing recovery may provide a competitive advantage. One method that is gaining popularity as a means to enhance post-game or post-training recovery is immersion in water. Much of the literature on the ability of water immersion as a means to improve athletic recovery appears to be based on anecdotal information, with limited research on actual performance change. Water immersion may cause physiological changes within the body that could improve recovery from exercise. These physiological changes include intracellular-intravascular fluid shifts, reduction of muscle oedema and increased cardiac output (without increasing energy expenditure), which increases blood flow and possible nutrient and waste transportation through the body. Also, there may be a psychological benefit to athletes with a reduced cessation of fatigue during immersion. Water temperature alters the physiological response to immersion and cool to thermoneutral temperatures may provide the best range for recovery. Further performance-orientated research is required to determine whether water immersion is beneficial to athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 586 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 572 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 130 22%
Student > Master 99 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 9%
Researcher 45 8%
Student > Postgraduate 29 5%
Other 108 18%
Unknown 124 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 226 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 6%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 160 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#771,629
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#707
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,476
of 285,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#82
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.