Title |
Camellia nanningensis sp. nov.: the earliest fossil wood record of the genus Camellia (Theaceae) from East Asia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10265-016-0846-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lu-Liang Huang, Jian-Hua Jin, Cheng Quan, Alexei A. Oskolski |
Abstract |
A new species Camellia nanningensis was described on the basis of well-preserved mummified wood from the upper Oligocene Yongning Formation of Nanning Basin in Guangxi Province, South China. This represents the most ancient fossil wood assigned to Camellia, and the earliest fossil record of the family Theaceae in China. This fossil material shows that Camellia occurred in China as early as the late Oligocene, suggesting more ancient radiation of this genus than estimated by molecular dating. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#278
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,615
of 370,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.