↓ Skip to main content

Moderate and heavy metabolic stress interval training improve arterial stiffness and heart rate dynamics in humans

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Moderate and heavy metabolic stress interval training improve arterial stiffness and heart rate dynamics in humans
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00421-012-2486-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Rakobowchuk, Emma Harris, Annabelle Taylor, Richard M. Cubbon, Karen M. Birch

Abstract

Traditional continuous aerobic exercise training attenuates age-related increases of arterial stiffness, however, training studies have not determined whether metabolic stress impacts these favourable effects. Twenty untrained healthy participants (n = 11 heavy metabolic stress interval training, n = 9 moderate metabolic stress interval training) completed 6 weeks of moderate or heavy intensity interval training matched for total work and exercise duration. Carotid artery stiffness, blood pressure contour analysis, and linear and non-linear heart rate variability were assessed before and following training. Overall, carotid arterial stiffness was reduced (p < 0.01), but metabolic stress-specific alterations were not apparent. There was a trend for increased absolute high-frequency (HF) power (p = 0.10) whereas both absolute low-frequency (LF) power (p = 0.05) and overall power (p = 0.02) were increased to a similar degree following both training programmes. Non-linear heart rate dynamics such as detrended fluctuation analysis [Formula: see text] also improved (p > 0.05). This study demonstrates the effectiveness of interval training at improving arterial stiffness and autonomic function, however, the metabolic stress was not a mediator of this effect. In addition, these changes were also independent of improvements in aerobic capacity, which were only induced by training that involved a high metabolic stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Canada 3 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 141 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Professor 10 7%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 50 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 10 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 35 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,864,795
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#606
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,346
of 177,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#11
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.