You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous sinus fistula prior to embolization: a comparison of techniques.
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, October 2005
|
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clayton Chi-Chang Chen, Patricia Chuen-Tsuei Chang, Cherng-Gueih Shy, Wen-Shien Chen, Hao-Chun Hung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 52% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,599,199
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,612
of 5,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,251
of 70,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.