| Title |
Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Surgery, June 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1381/096089298765554476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas S Hess, Douglas W Hess |
| Abstract |
This paper evaluates biliopancreatic diversion combined with the duodenal switch, forming a hybrid procedure which is a combination of restriction and malabsorption. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 26% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2012.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,485
of 3,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,772
of 34,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them