↓ Skip to main content

Involving Parents in Indicated Early Intervention for Childhood PTSD Following Accidental Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Involving Parents in Indicated Early Intervention for Childhood PTSD Following Accidental Injury
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10567-012-0124-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa E. Cobham, Sonja March, Alexandra De Young, Fiona Leeson, Reginald Nixon, Brett McDermott, Justin Kenardy

Abstract

Accidental injuries represent the most common type of traumatic event to which a youth is likely to be exposed. While the majority of youth who experience an accidental injury will recover spontaneously, a significant proportion will go on to develop Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). And yet, there is little published treatment outcome research in this area. This review focuses on two key issues within the child PTSD literature--namely the role of parents in treatment and the timing of intervention. The issue of parental involvement in the treatment of child PTSD is a question that is increasingly being recognized as important. In addition, the need to find a balance between providing early intervention to at risk youth while avoiding providing treatment to those youth who will recover spontaneously has yet to be addressed. This paper outlines the rationale for and the development of a trauma-focused CBT protocol with separate parent and child programs, for use with children and adolescents experiencing PTSD following an accidental injury. The protocol is embedded within an indicated intervention framework, allowing for the early identification of youth at risk within a medical setting. Two case studies are presented in order to illustrate key issues raised in the review, implementation of the interventions, and the challenges involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 44%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,171,492
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#323
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,668
of 170,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.