↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen-Rich Saline Protects Against Spinal Cord Injury in Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Hydrogen-Rich Saline Protects Against Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Published in
Neurochemical Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11064-010-0162-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chengwen Chen, Qianbo Chen, Yanfei Mao, Shengming Xu, Chunyan Xia, Xueyin Shi, John H. Zhang, Hongbin Yuan, Xuejun Sun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,465,704
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#1,492
of 2,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,394
of 95,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.