↓ Skip to main content

Ciliopathies

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
21 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ciliopathies
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2011
DOI 10.1056/nejmra1010172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert S. Schwartz, Friedhelm Hildebrandt, Thomas Benzing, Nicholas Katsanis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 433 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 20%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 49 11%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 90 20%
Unknown 96 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 128 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 19%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 105 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#746,590
of 25,085,000 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,200
of 32,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,569
of 114,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#40
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.