↓ Skip to main content

Brain Mechanisms of Change in Addiction Treatment: Models, Methods, and Emerging Findings

Overview of attention for article published in Current Addiction Reports, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Brain Mechanisms of Change in Addiction Treatment: Models, Methods, and Emerging Findings
Published in
Current Addiction Reports, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40429-016-0113-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tammy Chung, Antonio Noronha, Kathleen M. Carroll, Marc N. Potenza, Kent Hutchison, Vince D. Calhoun, John D. E. Gabrieli, Jon Morgenstern, Sara Jo Nixon, Bruce E. Wexler, Judson Brewer, Lara Ray, Francesca Filbey, Timothy J. Strauman, Hedy Kober, Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing

Abstract

Increased understanding of "how" and "for whom" treatment works at the level of the brain has potential to transform addictions treatment through the development of innovative neuroscience-informed interventions. The 2015 Science of Change meeting bridged the fields of neuroscience and psychotherapy research to identify brain mechanisms of behavior change that are "common" across therapies, and "specific" to distinct behavioral interventions. Conceptual models of brain mechanisms underlying effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, mindfulness interventions, and Motivational Interviewing were discussed. Presentations covered methods for integrating neuroimaging into psychotherapy research, and novel analytic approaches. Effects of heavy substance use on the brain, and recovery of brain functioning with sustained abstinence, which may be facilitated by cognitive training, were reviewed. Neuroimaging provides powerful tools for determining brain mechanisms underlying psychotherapy and medication effects, predicting and monitoring outcomes, developing novel interventions that target specific brain circuits, and identifying for whom an intervention will be effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Neuroscience 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,307,223
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Current Addiction Reports
#114
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,058
of 354,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Addiction Reports
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.