| Title |
Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 — Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2023184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongchao Pan, Richard Peto, Ana-Maria Henao-Restrepo, Marie-Pierre Preziosi, Vasee Sathiyamoorthy, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Marissa M Alejandria, César Hernández García, Marie-Paule Kieny, Reza Malekzadeh, Srinivas Murthy, K Srinath Reddy, Mirta Roses Periago, Pierre Abi Hanna, Florence Ader, Abdullah M Al-Bader, Almonther Alhasawi, Emma Allum, Athari Alotaibi, Carlos A Alvarez-Moreno, Sheila Appadoo, Abdullah Asiri, Pål Aukrust, Andreas Barratt-Due, Samir Bellani, Mattia Branca, Heike B C Cappel-Porter, Nery Cerrato, Ting S Chow, Najada Como, Joe Eustace, Patricia J García, Sheela Godbole, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Laimonas Griskevicius, Rasha Hamra, Mariam Hassan, Mohamed Hassany, David Hutton, Irmansyah Irmansyah, Ligita Jancoriene, Jana Kirwan, Suresh Kumar, Peter Lennon, Gustavo Lopardo, Patrick Lydon, Nicola Magrini, Teresa Maguire, Suzana Manevska, Oriol Manuel, Sibylle McGinty, Marco T Medina, María L Mesa Rubio, Maria C Miranda-Montoya, Jeremy Nel, Estevao P Nunes, Markus Perola, Antonio Portolés, Menaldi R Rasmin, Aun Raza, Helen Rees, Paula P S Reges, Chris A Rogers, Kolawole Salami, Marina I Salvadori, Narvina Sinani, Jonathan A C Sterne, Milena Stevanovikj, Evelina Tacconelli, Kari A O Tikkinen, Sven Trelle, Hala Zaid, John-Arne Røttingen, Soumya Swaminathan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,832 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 826 | 17% |
| United States | 350 | 7% |
| France | 173 | 4% |
| Spain | 136 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 127 | 3% |
| Brazil | 118 | 2% |
| Japan | 112 | 2% |
| Canada | 92 | 2% |
| Turkey | 46 | <1% |
| Other | 570 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2282 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4022 | 83% |
| Scientists | 353 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 328 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 125 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,869 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1869 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 223 | 12% |
| Researcher | 217 | 12% |
| Other | 160 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 160 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 119 | 6% |
| Other | 354 | 19% |
| Unknown | 636 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 556 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 140 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 108 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 53 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 3% |
| Other | 263 | 14% |
| Unknown | 697 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3967. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,262
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#103
of 32,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84
of 528,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#8
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.