↓ Skip to main content

Acute myeloid leukemia in clinical practice: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Acute myeloid leukemia in clinical practice: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12185-012-1146-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takuya Matsunaga, Kiyoshi Yamashita, Yoko Kubuki, Takanori Toyama, Osamu Imataki, Kouichi Maeda, Noriaki Kawano, Seiichi Satou, Hiroshi Kawano, Junzo Ishizaki, Shuro Yoshida, Takuro Kameda, Tadashi Sasaki, Masaaki Sekine, Ayako Kamiunten, Yasuhiro Taniguchi, Tomonori Hidaka, Keiko Katayose, Haruko K-Shimoda, Kotaro Shide, Shojiro Yamamoto, Hiroshi Moritake, Hiroyuki Nunoi, Shigeyoshi Makino, Akira Kitanaka, Hitoshi Matsuoka, Kazuya Shimoda

Abstract

We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. Over 6 years, we diagnosed 221 patients (211 adults and 10 children) with AML, indicating an incidence of AML in Miyazaki Prefecture of 3.2 per 100,000 per year. In 193 adult patients with non-acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the proportion of patients with myelodysplasia, unfavorable risk karyotypes, antecedent hematologic diseases, prior chemotherapy for other malignancies, and small proportion of blasts in the marrow was higher in patients ≥65 years, and patients with poor performance status (PS) and higher WBC counts at diagnosis were more prevalent among patients ≥75 years. One-third of the adult non-APL patients met the inclusion criteria usually applied in clinical trials: de novo AML, age ≤64 years with PS 0-2 and no key organ dysfunction. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of adult non-APL patients was 21.1 % (patients ≤64 years, 33.8 %; 65-74 years, 21.6 %; ≥75 years, 0 %). Multivariate analysis revealed that French-American-British subtypes M0, M6, and M7, poor PS (3, 4), unfavorable risk karyotypes, and higher WBC counts at diagnosis were independent adverse prognostic factors associated with OS. This analysis provides real world data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 48%
Other 4 19%
Lecturer 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,008,865
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#540
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,447
of 164,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.