| Title |
A systematic review with procedural assessments and meta-analysis of Low Level Laser Therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy (tennis elbow)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-9-75 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan M Bjordal, Rodrigo AB Lopes-Martins, Jon Joensen, Christian Couppe, Anne E Ljunggren, Apostolos Stergioulas, Mark I Johnson |
| Abstract |
Recent reviews have indicated that low level level laser therapy (LLLT) is ineffective in lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) without assessing validity of treatment procedures and doses or the influence of prior steroid injections. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Brazil | 2 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 13% |
| Researcher | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 114 | 25% |
| Unknown | 102 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 181 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 22 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 119 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,384,059
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#221
of 4,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,259
of 99,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.