You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the quality and trustworthiness of citizen science data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Concurrency & Computation: Practice & Experience, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cpe.2923 |
| Authors |
Jane Hunter, Abdulmonem Alabri, Catharine van Ingen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 20% |
| Researcher | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 51 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,476,625
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Concurrency & Computation: Practice & Experience
#64
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,662
of 187,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Concurrency & Computation: Practice & Experience
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them