↓ Skip to main content

Quality of core collections for effective utilisation of genetic resources review, discussion and interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Quality of core collections for effective utilisation of genetic resources review, discussion and interpretation
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00122-012-1971-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. L. Odong, J. Jansen, F. A. van Eeuwijk, T. J. L. van Hintum

Abstract

Definition of clear criteria for evaluation of the quality of core collections is a prerequisite for selecting high-quality cores. However, a critical examination of the different methods used in literature, for evaluating the quality of core collections, shows that there are no clear guidelines on the choices of quality evaluation criteria and as a result, inappropriate analyses are sometimes made leading to false conclusions being drawn regarding the quality of core collections and the methods to select such core collections. The choice of criteria for evaluating core collections appears to be based mainly on the fact that those criteria have been used in earlier publications rather than on the actual objectives of the core collection. In this study, we provide insight into different criteria used for evaluating core collections. We also discussed different types of core collections and related each type of core collection to their respective evaluation criteria. Two new criteria based on genetic distance are introduced. The consequences of the different evaluation criteria are illustrated using simulated and experimental data. We strongly recommend the use of the distance-based criteria since they not only allow the simultaneous evaluation of all variables describing the accessions, but they also provide intuitive and interpretable criteria, as compared with the univariate criteria generally used for the evaluation of core collections. Our findings will provide genebank curators and researchers with possibilities to make informed choices when creating, comparing and using core collections.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Argentina 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 176 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 22%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Computer Science 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 26 14%