↓ Skip to main content

Resources, Roadblocks and Turning Points: A Qualitative Study of American Indian/ Alaska Native Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Resources, Roadblocks and Turning Points: A Qualitative Study of American Indian/ Alaska Native Adults with Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
Journal of Community Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10900-012-9585-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Shaw, Jennifer Brown, Burhan Khan, Marjorie K. Mau, Denise Dillard

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes is a worldwide health problem that has reached epidemic proportions in some communities. Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) people are disproportionately diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and incidence is increasing in many Alaska communities. Developing effective interventions requires understanding the social and psychological factors that impact effective management of diabetes, yet little is known about these factors in AN/AI communities. The objective of this study was to explore perceived psychosocial needs and barriers to management of diabetes among AN/AI adults with type 2 diabetes receiving care at the Alaska Native Primary Care Center (ANPCC) to inform programmatic efforts and potential future research. We conducted three focus groups and five interviews with 13 AN/AI adults with type 2 diabetes. Interview and focus group questions elicited perceived factors that affect management of diabetes, with a focus on the psychological, social and spiritual impacts of diabetes. Data were transcribed, coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Key themes that emerged from these data included resources and roadblocks, as well as turning points in the trajectory of diabetes. Resources are factors with a perceived positive impact on management of diabetes, including: (1) knowledge and education about diabetes, (2) social support from other people with diabetes, (3) spirituality, and (4) self-efficacy. Roadblocks are factors with a perceived negative impact on management of diabetes and include: (1) self-reported lack of knowledge about nutrition and diet, (2) social difficulties caused by dietary restrictions, and (3) co-morbid medical conditions. Finally, turning points are experiences described by participants as having transformed roadblocks in resources and thus facilitating improvement in the management of diabetes. Future programmatic interventions to improve management of diabetes with this population should focus on improving dietary education and social support opportunities for newly-diagnosed individuals. Also, educational and support opportunities for family members and friends of individuals with diabetes should also be offered to facilitate understanding and support of their loved ones' management of diabetes, especially with regard to dietary restrictions in social settings. Efforts should also focus on strengthening newly-diagnosed individuals' self-efficacy and providing ongoing support as individuals progressively adjust to the illness over time and make behavioral changes. Future research with this population should explore the effects of family support groups and the possibility of Web-based or other alternative interventions for improving psychosocial health and management of diabetes efforts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Barbados 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 15%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 19%
Psychology 34 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#1,093
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,280
of 164,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.