| Title |
Ethical Considerations in the Framing of the Cognitive Enhancement Debate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-011-9131-7 |
| Authors |
Simon M. Outram |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 63 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2012.
All research outputs
#4,273,351
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#248
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,037
of 117,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.