↓ Skip to main content

Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: Lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 548)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
91 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: Lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11154-016-9372-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Shearer, Susan E. Swithers

Abstract

Escalating rates of obesity and public health messages to reduce excessive sugar intake have fuelled the consumption of artificial sweeteners in a wide range of products from breakfast cereals to snack foods and beverages. Artificial sweeteners impart a sweet taste without the associated energy and have been widely recommended by medical professionals since they are considered safe. However, associations observed in long-term prospective studies raise the concern that regular consumption of artificial sweeteners might actually contribute to development of metabolic derangements that lead to obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Obtaining mechanistic data on artificial sweetener use in humans in relation to metabolic dysfunction is difficult due to the long time frames over which dietary factors might exert their effects on health and the large number of confounding variables that need to be considered. Thus, mechanistic data from animal models can be highly useful because they permit greater experimental control. Results from animal studies in both the agricultural sector and the laboratory indicate that artificial sweeteners may not only promote food intake and weight gain but can also induce metabolic alterations in a wide range of animal species. As a result, simple substitution of artificial sweeteners for sugars in humans may not produce the intended consequences. Instead consumption of artificial sweeteners might contribute to increases in risks for obesity or its attendant negative health outcomes. As a result, it is critical that the impacts of artificial sweeteners on health and disease continue to be more thoroughly evaluated in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 22%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Professor 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#446,140
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#17
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,839
of 371,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.