↓ Skip to main content

Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems
Published in
Synthese, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11229-004-6264-9
Authors

Ruth E. Kastner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 10 42%
Philosophy 7 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#826
of 2,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,169
of 66,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.