↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Destroyed documents: uncovering the science that Imperial Tobacco Canada sought to conceal

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Destroyed documents: uncovering the science that Imperial Tobacco Canada sought to conceal
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2009
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.080566
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Hammond, Michael Chaiton, Alex Lee, Neil Collishaw

Abstract

In 1992, British American Tobacco had its Canadian affiliate, Imperial Tobacco Canada, destroy internal research documents that could expose the company to liability or embarrassment. Sixty of these destroyed documents were subsequently uncovered in British American Tobacco's files.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Computer Science 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,257,471
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,552
of 8,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,604
of 92,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.