↓ Skip to main content

Possibilities and Limitations of Computer-Assisted Method Development in HILIC: A Case Study

Overview of attention for article published in Chromatographia, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Possibilities and Limitations of Computer-Assisted Method Development in HILIC: A Case Study
Published in
Chromatographia, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10337-016-3127-8
Authors

Eva Tyteca, Stefan Bieber, Thomas Letzel, Gert Desmet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#19,766,400
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from Chromatographia
#784
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,335
of 361,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromatographia
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.