| Title |
Common envelope evolution: where we stand and how we can move forward
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00159-013-0059-2 |
| Authors |
N. Ivanova, S. Justham, X. Chen, O. De Marco, C. L. Fryer, E. Gaburov, H. Ge, E. Glebbeek, Z. Han, X.-D. Li, G. Lu, T. Marsh, P. Podsiadlowski, A. Potter, N. Soker, R. Taam, T. M. Tauris, E. P. J. van den Heuvel, R. F. Webbink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Russia | 2 | 7% |
| Armenia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 86% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 27% |
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 155 | 79% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#259,657
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
#6
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,569
of 209,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them