↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

L’obésité chez l’adulte : ligne directrice de pratique clinique

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
L’obésité chez l’adulte : ligne directrice de pratique clinique
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2020
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.191707-f
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean Wharton, David C W Lau, Michael Vallis, Arya M Sharma, Laurent Biertho, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Kristi Adamo, Angela Alberga, Rhonda Bell, Normand Boulé, Elaine Boyling, Jennifer Brown, Betty Calam, Carol Clarke, Lindsay Crowshoe, Dennis Divalentino, Mary Forhan, Yoni Freedhoff, Michel Gagner, Stephen Glazer, Cindy Grand, Michael Green, Margaret Hahn, Raed Hawa, Rita Henderson, Dennis Hong, Pam Hung, Ian Janssen, Kristen Jacklin, Carlene Johnson-Stoklossa, Amy Kemp, Sara Kirk, Jennifer Kuk, Marie-France Langlois, Scott Lear, Ashley McInnes, David Macklin, Leen Naji, Priya Manjoo, Marie-Philippe Morin, Kara Nerenberg, Ian Patton, Sue Pedersen, Leticia Pereira, Helena Piccinini-Vallis, Megha Poddar, Paul Poirier, Denis Prud'homme, Ximena Ramos Salas, Christian Rueda-Clausen, Shelly Russell-Mayhew, Judy Shiau, Diana Sherifali, John Sievenpiper, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Valerie Taylor, Ellen Toth, Laurie Twells, Richard Tytus, Shahebina Walji, Leah Walker, Sonja Wicklum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Psychology 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,168,688
of 25,037,495 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,604
of 9,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,783
of 522,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#31
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,037,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.