You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41558-020-00944-0 |
| Authors |
J. Loisel, A. V. Gallego-Sala, M. J. Amesbury, G. Magnan, G. Anshari, D. W. Beilman, J. C. Benavides, J. Blewett, P. Camill, D. J. Charman, S. Chawchai, A. Hedgpeth, T. Kleinen, A. Korhola, D. Large, C. A. Mansilla, J. Müller, S. van Bellen, J. B. West, Z. Yu, J. L. Bubier, M. Garneau, T. Moore, A. B. K. Sannel, S. Page, M. Väliranta, M. Bechtold, V. Brovkin, L. E. S. Cole, J. P. Chanton, T. R. Christensen, M. A. Davies, F. De Vleeschouwer, S. A. Finkelstein, S. Frolking, M. Gałka, L. Gandois, N. Girkin, L. I. Harris, A. Heinemeyer, A. M. Hoyt, M. C. Jones, F. Joos, S. Juutinen, K. Kaiser, T. Lacourse, M. Lamentowicz, T. Larmola, J. Leifeld, A. Lohila, A. M. Milner, K. Minkkinen, P. Moss, B. D. A. Naafs, J. Nichols, J. O’Donnell, R. Payne, M. Philben, S. Piilo, A. Quillet, A. S. Ratnayake, T. P. Roland, S. Sjögersten, O. Sonnentag, G. T. Swindles, W. Swinnen, J. Talbot, C. Treat, A. C. Valach, J. Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 38 | 22% |
| Canada | 11 | 7% |
| United States | 10 | 6% |
| France | 7 | 4% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Poland | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 66% |
| Scientists | 53 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 390 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 69 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Unknown | 141 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 93 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 44 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Unknown | 167 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 455. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#61,490
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#263
of 4,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,889
of 529,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 132.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.