↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of a fully closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV®) in sedated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective randomized crossover study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Safety and efficacy of a fully closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV®) in sedated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective randomized crossover study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2548-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Michel Arnal, Marc Wysocki, Dominik Novotni, Didier Demory, Ricardo Lopez, Stéphane Donati, Isabelle Granier, Gaëlle Corno, Jacques Durand-Gasselin

Abstract

IntelliVent-ASV(®) is a development of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) that automatically adjusts ventilation and oxygenation parameters. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of IntelliVent-ASV(®) in sedated intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 24%
Other 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 32 25%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 51%
Engineering 15 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Computer Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,914,676
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,728
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,235
of 160,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.