↓ Skip to main content

Commentary on “The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons” by R.G.J. Stevens et al.

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plastic Surgery, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Commentary on “The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons” by R.G.J. Stevens et al.
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00238-011-0686-7
Authors

Horacio F. Mayer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#389
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,266
of 245,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.