| Title |
Trends in diabetes medication use in Canada, England, Scotland and Australia: a repeated cross-sectional analysis (2012-2017)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x714089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle Greiver, Alys Havard, Juliana KF Bowles, Sumeet Kalia, Tao Chen, Babak Aliarzadeh, Rahim Moineddin, Julian Sherlock, William Hinton, Frank Sullivan, Braden O’Neill, Conrad Pow, Aashka Bhatt, Fahurrozi Rahman, Bernardo Meza-Torres, Melisa Litchfield, Simon de Lusignan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 40% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,984,603
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,644
of 4,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,269
of 514,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#53
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.