↓ Skip to main content

Landslide management in the UK—the problem of managing hazards in a ‘low-risk’ environment

Overview of attention for article published in Landslides, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Landslide management in the UK—the problem of managing hazards in a ‘low-risk’ environment
Published in
Landslides, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10346-012-0346-4
Authors

A. D. Gibson, M. G. Culshaw, C. Dashwood, C. V. L. Pennington

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 8 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 26 30%
Engineering 18 20%
Environmental Science 14 16%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,053
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#321
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,521
of 169,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.