↓ Skip to main content

The evolving role of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
The evolving role of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2002
DOI 10.1007/s101470200040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kefah Mokbel

Abstract

Anti-aromatase agents inhibit the cytochrome p-450 component of the aromatase enzyme complex responsible for the final step of estrogen biosynthesis in peripheral tissues. These drugs can be classified into first-generation (e.g., aminoglutethimide), second-generation (e.g., formestane and fadrazole), and third-generation (e.g., anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) agents. Anti-aromatase agents can also be divided into type I and type II inhibitors. Type I inhibitors have a steroidal structure similar to androgens and inactivate the enzyme irreversibly by blocking the substrate-binding site, and are therefore known as aromatase inactivators. Type II inhibitors are nonsteroidal and their action is reversible. This article reviews the recent evidence regarding the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors in the management of breast cancer. Relevant PubMed listed articles and presentations at recent international symposia were reviewed. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) as first-line and second-line therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and as a neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer unsuitable for breast-conserving surgery. Furthermore, the preliminary results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone and in Combination) study have shown that adjuvant anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), adverse effects, and prevention of contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with early, ER-positive breast cancer. However, longer follow-up is required to assess the long-term effects of these agents on bone mineral density, cognitive function, and overall survival prior to considering their routine use in the adjuvant setting instead of tamoxifen. The potential role of these drugs in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), premenopausal breast cancer, and breast cancer prevention is worth investigating.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 23%
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Chemistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,959,493
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#103
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,648
of 46,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them