| Title |
“Inappropriate Prescriptions of Direct Oral Anticoagulants among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice: a Cross-sectional Analysis of the French CACAO Cohort Study”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x714005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilie Ferrat, Julie Fabre, Philippe Galletout, Emmanuelle Boutin, Julien Le Breton, Vincent Renard, Paul Frappé, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Egypt | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,663,144
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,582
of 4,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,076
of 524,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#52
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.