| Title |
CATCH: a clinical decision rule for the use of computed tomography in children with minor head injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.091421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin H Osmond, Terry P Klassen, George A Wells, Rhonda Correll, Anna Jarvis, Gary Joubert, Benoit Bailey, Laurel Chauvin-Kimoff, Martin Pusic, Don McConnell, Cheri Nijssen-Jordan, Norm Silver, Brett Taylor, Ian G Stiell |
| Abstract |
There is controversy about which children with minor head injury need to undergo computed tomography (CT). We aimed to develop a highly sensitive clinical decision rule for the use of CT in children with minor head injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 13% |
| Researcher | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 107 | 26% |
| Unknown | 73 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 262 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 4% |
| Psychology | 10 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Unknown | 94 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#885,688
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,309
of 8,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,765
of 165,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.