| Title |
Perspectives on Sexual Identity Formation, Identity Practices, and Identity Transitions Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Sexual Behavior, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10508-016-0775-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecilia Tomori, Aylur K. Srikrishnan, Kathleen Ridgeway, Sunil S. Solomon, Shruti H. Mehta, Suniti Solomon, David D. Celentano |
| Abstract |
Men who have sex with men (MSM) remain at high risk for HIV infection. Culturally specific sexual identities, encompassing sexual roles, behavior, and appearance, may shape MSM's experiences of stigmatization and discrimination, and affect their vulnerability to HIV. This multi-site qualitative study (n = 363) encompassing 31 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 121 in-depth interviews (IDIs) across 15 sites in India investigated sexual identity formation, identity practices, and transitions and their implications for HIV prevention. IDIs and FGDs were transcribed, translated, and underwent thematic analysis. Our findings document heterogeneous sexual identity formation, with MSM who have more gender nonconforming behaviors or appearance reporting greater family- and community-level disapproval, harassment, violence, and exclusion. Concealing feminine aspects of sexual identities was important in daily life, especially for married MSM. Some participants negotiated their identity practices in accordance with socioeconomic and cultural pressures, including taking on identity characteristics to suit consumer demand in sex work and on extended periods of joining communities of hijras (sometimes called TG or transgender women). Participants also reported that some MSM transition toward more feminine and hijra or transgender women identities, motivated by intersecting desires for feminine gender expression and by social exclusion and economic marginalization. Future studies should collect information on gender nonconformity stigma, and any changes in sexual identity practices or plans for transitions to other identities over time, in relation to HIV risk behaviors and outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,929,031
of 24,036,420 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,217
of 3,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,165
of 361,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#45
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,036,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.