↓ Skip to main content

Using Constructs of the Transtheoretical Model to Predict Classes of Change in Regular Physical Activity: A Multi-Ethnic Longitudinal Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Using Constructs of the Transtheoretical Model to Predict Classes of Change in Regular Physical Activity: A Multi-Ethnic Longitudinal Cohort Study
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12160-010-9196-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rod K. Dishman, Robert J. Vandenberg, Robert W. Motl, Claudio R. Nigg

Abstract

Explaining variation in meeting recommended levels of physical activity across time is important for the design of effective public health interventions. To model longitudinal change in constructs of the Transtheoretical Model and test their hypothesized relations with change in meeting the Healthy People 2010 guidelines for regular participation in moderate or vigorous physical activity, a cohort (N = 497) from a random, multi-ethnic sample of 700 adults living in Hawaii was assessed at 6-month intervals three or more times for 2 years. Latent class growth modeling was used to classify people according to their initial levels and trajectories of change in the transtheoretical variables and separately according to whether they met the physical activity guideline each time. Relations of the variables and their change with classes of meeting the guideline were then tested using multinomial logistic regression. Despite declines or no change in mean scores for all transtheoretical variables except self-efficacy, participants who maintained or attained the physical activity guideline were more likely to retain higher scores across the 2 years of observation. The usefulness of transtheoretical constructs for predicting maintenance of, or increases in, public health levels of physical activity was generally supported. These longitudinal results support earlier cross-sectional findings which indicate that, contrary to theory, people appear to use both experiential and behavioral processes while they attempt to increase or maintain their physical activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Master 18 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 26%
Social Sciences 19 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Sports and Recreations 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,733,275
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1,041
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,634
of 95,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.