| Title |
White Flight Revisited: A Multiethnic Perspective on Neighborhood Out-Migration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Research and Policy Review, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11113-008-9101-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeremy F. Pais, Scott J. South, Kyle Crowder |
| Abstract |
Using geo-linked data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the decennial census, we compare probabilities of neighborhood out-migration for Anglos, blacks, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and Cubans by varying ethno-racial neighborhood compositions. Analyses for Latinos are disaggregated by nativity status. The results indicate that Anglos have a higher likelihood of moving when they have many minority neighbors and there is little difference whether minority neighbors are black or Latino. Among minorities there is some evidence of "minority flight" from whiter neighborhoods. Cubans, especially foreign-born Cubans, demonstrate the strongest propensity to flee neighborhoods with large black populations, whereas the probability of moving out decreases for Mexicans and Puerto Ricans when their neighbors are more likely to be black. Ethno-racial neighborhood composition has little effect on blacks' decision to leave their neighborhood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 40% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 54 | 81% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 5 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,770,484
of 25,000,733 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#72
of 683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,694
of 80,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,000,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.