| Title |
ABO blood group and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-012-0059-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth M. Poole, Margaret A. Gates, Brigit A. High, Stephen J. Chanock, Daniel W. Cramer, Julie M. Cunningham, Brooke L. Fridley, Simon A. Gayther, Ellen L. Goode, Edwin S. Iversen, Jolanta Lissowska, Rachel T. Palmieri Weber, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Catherine M. Phelan, Susan J. Ramus, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Rebecca Sutphen, Ya-Yu Tsai, Jonathan Tyrer, Robert A. Vierkant, Nicolas Wentzensen, Hannah P. Yang, Kathryn L. Terry, Shelley S. Tworoger |
| Abstract |
Previous studies have examined the association between ABO blood group and ovarian cancer risk, with inconclusive results. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 26% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,712,381
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#1,891
of 2,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,994
of 187,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.